TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Well it is.
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject Well it is.
     
Posted by Kenny on September 19, 2006 at 5:37 PM
  This message has been viewed 39 times.
     
In Reply To exactly, I don't think it to be a stretch at all. (n/m) posted by Adam (NoVA) on September 19, 2006 at 03:59 PM
     
Message The camber wasn't the issue, the tire wear was. You can have a degree excessive negative camber and suffer no ill straight-line handling effects (with positive effects on cornering).

He hydroplaned due to lack of tire tread, which was caused by non-replacement of worn tires - a symptom of excessive camber. The lack of tire tread created the unsafe condition, and could have been remedied by tire replacement - thus you cannot argue that a camber kit necessarily would have prevented this accident. You initial statement was not incorrect, as you suggested it to be a possible solution with the same replacement periodicity - but it is a "stretch." The direct cause of the accident of lack of tire tread, not excessive negative camber.

Recursively Yours,
Kenny...

PETZ Member #5





     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.